A World Without Christian Restraints

In First Things, Gerald J. Russello reviews the HBO series Rome and while he doesn't claim it is a perfect presentation of ancient Rome, gives it several kudos for it's portrayal.  He says this:

What was perhaps the most pro-Christian show on television did not have a single Christian character in it—and there was no way it could have. Rome, the hit series that has just completed its second (and for now final) season on the cable channel HBO, turned out to be a surprising affirmation of the Western religious tradition. While it is packed with sex and violence, its message—intended or not—is that the Roman world was desperate for Christianity.

And, after looking at the immorality and brutality that was so prevalent in ancient Rome, concludes with this:

These days, some contend that a world without Christian restraints would be more egalitarian, less violent, and more individualistic. But for those with a historical sense, Rome shows that another alternative is more likely. The classical world was not all marble columns and noble rhetoric. It was a world where the strong ruled, and those who could not conquer were themselves conquered. Far from being egalitarian, the only clear rule was inequality: between masters and slaves, husbands and wives, or plebeians and patricians. Those wishing to reject the West’s Christian heritage should take a hard look at what that world was like.

Hat Tip - Allen Thornburgh at The Point

Related Tags: Television, HBO, First Things, Religion, Theology, Culture, Rome, Ancient Rome, Christian, Christianity