OK, I realize that in many circles, Rick Warren and the whole Purpose Driven phenomenon are revered as one of God's great gifts to the church in our time. Churches all across the country are reporting staggering growth, revitalization and revival. On the other hand, Rick Warren has become a whipping boy for the anti-Church Growth crowd. He is popular, he is out there in the public eye and is an easy target for those who disagree.
Although I'm one of those who have some problems with the whole phenomenon, I'm trying to low-key it on the criticism. He's receiving so much criticism in some circles that it looks to some as if people are jumping on the "Purpose Driven is Eeevil" bandwagon the way its advocates are jumping on the "Purpose Driven is Wonderful" bandwagon. The temptation of the advocates is to say "you're just a malcontent, trying to explain away your own failures and lack of growth in your church."
So, although I've got some definite opinions on the matter I'm trying to go as low key as I can, at least until I can finish reading his book to see if the criticisms are true. However, back in March when I was in California I did get to visit his church and Grace Community Church (with John MacArthur) on the same Sunday. I am planning to publish a blog entry on that experience called "A Tale of Two Churches." I just haven't gotten around to it.
Today I came across something in the Get Religion blog that raised a question for me. Terry Mattingly wrote an article on Wal-Mart and linked to a separate article from one of Warren's critics. This critical article says, among other things:
"People have said this is like the 'Wal-Mart effect' -- that is, you have a big entity organization within your community [that] offers all kinds of products, all kinds of things," he says. "And usually that draws from smaller churches -- it certainly doesn't draw from just the lost."I think the Wal-Mart effect refers to the fact that, when Wal-Mart's go into a town, all of the mom and pop shops around tend to close down. Obviously, this guy is saying that the Purpose Driven thing tends to draw Christians from other churches, more than it does from the lost.
I'm just curious to know if this is true. Is all this church growth from the Purpose Driven campaign just from Christians leaving one church to go to another? Or are there multitudes of people coming to Christ.
If it's true is it necessarily bad? For example, if Warren is preaching the gospel (and there is some doubt about that in some quarters), then its not a bad thing for a person to leave a liberal church which doesn't preach the gospel to come to one that does.
These are just a few questions worth asking for friends and foes of Purpose Driven alike.

In a Barna book, "Grow Your Church From The Outside In" it says 80% of church growth is either transfer growth or biological. If you count children a blessing from the Lord, then biological growth is good. One might argue that transfer growth is "sheep stealing". But I would say that transfer is not necessarily as evil as it might sound. For one, in a mobile society, transfer growth means that people who move are not dropping out of church. Just as biological growth shows a sucessful passing on of the faith from one generation to another, so transfer growth shows a solid work from one geographic ministry to another. I know that not all transfer growth is a as idealistic as that, but we do have to be careful about looking down our noses at transfer growth. A church should be looking to attract new members of the community. If transfer growth is the only means of growth, then the people need a passion for the lost.
A link to that book....
http://www.barna.org/cgi-bin/PageExcerpt.asp?ProductID=53
Posted by: Terry | April 18, 2004 at 05:23 PM
I have certainly heard many times that church's like Warren's are built very much on transfer growth. A friend read a study which showed that Willow Creek, for example, has only a very small percentage of new Christians. And I have certainly seen some evidence of that in my limited experience.
I think what happens is that these churches emphasize programs over preaching. Many people are drawn to fun and exciting programs, so leave their small churches to head to the more exciting options.
I would love to see some hard data for this, though.
Posted by: Tim | April 19, 2004 at 09:18 AM
Mario Murillo on last Thursday night's TBN Praise The Lord program talked about the Pablum-driven church and the Wal-Mart effect. Interesting that you brought this topic up in your post. I have some highlights in this post at:
http://www.availablelightonline.com/blog/index.php?p=412
Posted by: Totem to Temple | April 20, 2004 at 09:07 PM
hi
intersting thoughts. As a leader of a very small church (15 adults ) and a very young church (1 year old) we are about to suggest that we become anti christian. That is to state that we do not accept any transfers unless they clear a whole lot of hurdles first.
I have to say that many church leaders I have spoken to are uncomfortable with this idea, but how else can we keep our energies focused on the task of reaching out and serving our community and not spend all out energy serving eachother?
Posted by: alex davie | May 20, 2004 at 04:22 AM